News 
 National Rural News 
 Wool 
 General 
 AWI employs nomination committee 

AWI employs nomination committee

26 May, 2011 04:00 AM
AUSTRALIAN Wool Innovation chairman Wal Merriman is happy with the skills of the AWI board’s current directors, but his board still has to conform with a government-dictated re-election process.

As part of that process, a new nomination committee to assess the skills of new directors was announced this week.

The nomination committee’s three external members will be National Farmer Federation chairman Jock Laurie, Bell Financial Group Ltd executive chairman Colin Bell and Australian Securities Exchange sales and marketing general manager Will Wilson.

Mr Merriman and deputy AWI chairman Roger Fletcher will also be on the committee.

“I don’t think there any skills missing with the current board,” Mr Merriman said this week.

The board had to be appreciated for its “collective skill-set”, he said.

Under a statutory funding agreement with the Federal Government, AWI is required to appoint the nomination committee and have a skills-based board with expertise in various areas. These include corporate governance, wool growing and processing, product promotion and retail marketing, domestic and international market development, research and development adoption and administration, technology, natural resource management, finance and business management.

Four current directors are eligible for re-election this year, but the AWI board could decide to have up to 10 directors. Any individual can still be considered as a candidate for the AWI board by obtaining 100 signatures under the terms of the AWI constitution.

With Chick Olsson resigning this month, the current board has six directors, but Mr Merriman said the number of seats available on the board won’t be known until the size of the new board was decided at its next meeting on June 3.

“If it is seven (directors) it will be three (directors up for re-election) and if it is six (directors) it will two,” he said.

The new board nomination committee will consider the skills of any candidates nominated, including directors seeking re-election, recommending to shareholders those candidates it thinks best ensure that the board has an appropriate balance of skills and experience in the areas specified in the SFA.

Nominations for the 2011 AWI board election must be received by the AWI company secretary, between September 19 and October 7 this year for the AGM to be held in Sydney on November 18 2011.

The amended Rules and the new nomination form and consent to nomination form are available at www.wool.com/agm

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The current A.W.I. board would have more skills in it's little finger than the rest of the peak bodies put together.
Posted by John Niven, 26/05/2011 8:02:31 AM
The reason why this committee was imposed upon AWI was because the review into RDC's found AWI was the single worst offender when it came to skills base of its Board members. Make no mistake, this committee is nothing for AWI to be boasting about - in fact the wool industry should regard it with a sense of shame. If you disagree, read the review into Australian RDC's before you make a fool of yourself.
Posted by Steve, 26/05/2011 12:40:34 PM
rare that i agee with J Niven. But on this occasion yes i believe he is correct.
Posted by The Differentiator, 26/05/2011 1:21:03 PM
Still we are being dictated to by the politicians.

What other board in Australia has this imposition put on it by government?

If this rule had been in place earlier probably only George Falkiner and Brian van Rooyen of the current board would ever have been allowed to nominate in the first place. George on his own could not have saved the show.

This rule was demanded by the people who nearly wiped out AWI and the wool industry with it.

Fortunately it came in too late to prevent the necessary changes.

Posted by Ted O'Brien, 26/05/2011 1:48:02 PM
Nomination committer? Why wasnt I consulted? This is an industry decision, not a government imposition. Disgraceful and undemocratic.
Posted by T. Moore. Qld, 26/05/2011 3:50:37 PM
The shareholders should have been given the opportunity to change to the governance of AWI. The government are not shareholders of the company. Why wasn't this put to growers at WoolPoll next year?
Posted by Maverick, 26/05/2011 4:58:20 PM
I support John Niven
Posted by Jock Munro, 26/05/2011 6:34:55 PM
Scrap this board, worthless investments done on some flop projects (Prince Charles Campaign)--which is hardly known even in UK.

these people are paying hugely to the consultants. either remove the CEO & Sam Guthrie ... or prepare for 0% levy on next election.

Posted by richard, 30/05/2011 4:22:16 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Wal Merriman
Wal Merriman
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
19 May, 2011
15 May, 2011
21 May, 2011
20 May, 2011
POLL
Q: Is the evidence for global warming beyond doubt?

Yes
(25%)

No
(67.5%)

Undecided
(7.5%)

Total Votes: 644
Poll Date: 23 May, 2011

Most popular articles

Advertisement



North Queensland Register







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...